VISUALIZING PREHISTORIC COLLECTIONS: Cultural Representation at Sri Baduga Museum
Abstract
Sri Baduga Museum preserves around 7,000 artifacts representing West Java’s cultural heritage, yet the current visualization of its prehistoric to Hindu–Buddhist collections on the first floor has not fully supported visitors' understanding. The 49% decline in visitor numbers from 2023 to 2024 further highlights the urgency of evaluating the effectiveness of visual communication in conveying cultural meanings. Addressing the limited scholarly attention to local cultural visualization—particularly Sundanese heritage—this study examines how the museum’s visual elements represent West Javanese culture and identifies obstacles that hinder visitors’ interpretive processes. Employing a qualitative approach using observation, interviews, and questionnaires with 35 respondents, this research explores visitors' perceptions and experiences. The findings show that 62% of visitors find the visual presentation appealing; however, issues such as small text, dense infographics, and an inadequate layout reduce readability and constrain meaning-making. Through Peirce’s semiotics, Stuart Hall’s representation theory, and the Shannon–Weaver communication model, the study reveals that suboptimal visual design generates communicative “noise” that disrupts cultural interpretation. The study contributes to the field by foregrounding Sundanese cultural visualization within a regional museum context, a topic rarely discussed in Indonesian museology literature. These insights underscore the need for more interactive, contextual, and modern visual strategies to enhance visitor understanding, engagement, and the overall effectiveness of cultural representation.
To cite this article (7th APA style):
Tison, K. C., & Putri, I. P. (2025). Visualizing Prehistoric Collections: Cultural Representation at Sri Baduga Museum. Journal Communication Spectrum: Capturing New Perspectives in Communication, 15(1), 69-78. https://doi.org/10.36782/jcs.v15i1.2650
Keywords
References
Bennett, T. (2013). The birth of the museum: History, theory, politics. Routledge.
Bogdan, R., & Taylor, S. J. (1975). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A phenomenological approach to the social sciences. Wiley-Interscience.
Capece, S., & Chivăran, C. (2020). The sensorial dimension of the contemporary museum between design and emerging technologies. IOP Conference Series. Materials Science and Engineering, 949(1), 012067. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/949/1/012067
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Denysіyuk, Z. (2021). Museum communication in the conditions of digitalization. Scientific Journal “Library Science. Record Studies. Informology,” 3, 64–70. https://doi.org/10.32461/2409-9805.3.2021.244718
Dierking, L. D., Falk, J. H., & Storksdieck, M. (2013). Learning from neighboring fields: Conceptualizing outcomes of environmental education within the framework of free-choice learning experiences. In R. B. Stevenson, M. Brody, J. Dillon, & A. E. J. Wals (Eds.), International Handbook of Research on Environmental Education (pp. 359–366). Routledge.
Guillot, M.-N. (2014). Cross-cultural pragmatics and translation: The case of museum texts as interlingual representation. In J. House (Ed.), Translation: A Multidisciplinary Approach (pp. 73–95). Palgrave Macmillan.
Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. SAGE Publications.
Hooper-Greenhill, E. (2000). Changing values in the art museum: Rethinking communication and learning. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 6(1), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/135272500363715
Husni, M., Sringah, S., Susilo, E., Listiawati, L., & Narko, S. (1994, January 1). Direktori museum di Indonesia. Direktorat Jenderal Kebudayaan. https://repositori.kemendikdasmen.go.id/14122
Ippoliti, E., & Albisinni, P. (2016). Virtual museums. Communication and/is representation. Disegnare Con, 9(17), 1–15. https://disegnarecon.univaq.it/ojs/index.php/disegnarecon/article/view/232
Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. (2025). Data referensi: Jumlah museum per provinsi. https://referensi.data.kemdikbud.go.id/kebudayaan/museum
Kumparan. (2022, August 29). Macam-macam museum di Indonesia dan contohnya. https://kumparan.com/berita-hari-ini/macam-macam-museum-di-indonesia-dan-contohnya-1ykrMfIxLXz/full
Lazzeretti, L., & Cerquetti, M. (2021). Museum, culture and digital innovations. Introduction. Il Capitale Culturale - Studies on the Value of Cultural Heritage, 23, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.13138/2039-2362/2722
Lester, P. M. (2002). Visual communication: Images with messages (3rd ed.). Wadsworth Publishing.
Marsitaully, C. (2024, November 9). Kementerian Kebudayaan dan Kemajuan pengelolaan museum di Indonesia. Sembaridinas. https://sembaridinas.id/article/kementerian-kebudayaan-dan-kemajuan-pengelolaan-museum-di-indonesia-8zbA4
Peirce, C. S. (2005). Semiotics (J. T. C. Netto, Trans.; 3rd ed.). Perspective. (Original work published 1931)
Polyakova, E. A., & Poydina, T. V. (2018). Representative communication and its role in the development of the church museum as an educational form of culture. European Journal of Science and Theology, 14(6), 225–234. https://www.ejst.tuiasi.ro/Files/73/22_Polyakova%20&%20Poydina.pdf
Rebollo-Sánchez, A., Feliu-Torruella, M., & Sospedra-Roca, R. (2024). New perceptions and representation in the museum. The case of the museu particular from the perspective of professionals in the cultural sector. Social and Education History, 13(2), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.17583/hse.14993
Santagati, C., Galizia, M., Basso, A., & La Russa, F. M. (2019). Reshaping the identity of university museums: The Museo della rappresentazione in Catania as digital innovation hub for the engagement of new generations and the development of the territory. In A. Luigini (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1st International and Interdisciplinary Conference on Digital Environments for Education, Arts and Heritage (EARTH 2018) (pp. 737–746). Springer International Publishing.
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press.
Sukirno, Z. L. (2020). Etika komunikasi visual influencer pariwisata. Journal of Tourism and Creativity, 4(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.19184/jtc.v4i2.15713
Sunaryo, A. (2022). Literasi sejarah dan budaya melalui museum sebagai wahana peningkatan rasa nasionalisme bagi pelajar. Jurnal Inovasi Pertahanan, 8(1), 1–11. https://jurnalinovasipertahanan.id/index.php/litbanghan/issue/view/50
Suryani, C. S., Andari, R., & Taufik, A. (2018). Pengaruh perceived quality terhadap kepuasan pengunjung di museum Mandala Wangsit Siliwangi. THE Journal: Tourism and Hospitality Essentials Journal, 8(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.17509/thej.v8i2.13741
Vasylenko, D., & Butko, L. (2021). Implementation of communication elements in the work of a museum institution. In Historical and cultural heritage: Preservation, access, use (pp. 186–197). National Aviation University. https://doi.org/10.18372/53287
Winanti, A. I. P., Mutiara, N. I., & Putri, E. A. T. (2024). Representasi budaya Jember di Museum Tembakau. WISSEN : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 2(3), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.62383/wissen.v2i3.177
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Indexed by:
Archived in:
Listed in:
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION RESEARCH














