Daniel Oloo Ong’ong’a


This study looks into how people who read news online think about it and helps to reduce the amount of false information spread on social media. The goal of this study was to identify the tactics used by the media when confronted by opposing opinions from their audience in the social media sphere. Social media platforms are essential when people want to debate and get more information on news stories they believe to be false. This study focuses on the importance of a YouTube channel run by a global media outlet that broadcasts a conflicting story. The study used a thematic content qualitative analysis on a sampled comments and used, a data extraction tool, to extract qualitative data from the YouTube channels. The study revealed that positive comments were followed by positive comments and vice versa. The commenters on these media also frequently search other social media for stories with a similar theme and compare the veracity and coherence of those stories' reported themes. Additionally, these commenters were prepared to defend stories that they believed to be inaccurate and assert that the media should uphold the principle of professionalism. Social media acts as a public sphere. It is not only a political sphere but also a place that is free from private ownership and censorship. The study established that the concept of the public sphere is likely to be abused when the media report conflicting stories that may not auger well with their audience. Although this theory guides the participation of users on the social media platforms, since most are free from the censorship of different players, the media tend to mute the comment sections of their pages for fear of further misinformation and criticism. Social media platforms offer people a reason to speak freely and demonstrate their sentiments openly. The study's results demonstrate that audiences play a significant role in correcting stories on social media, and that constructive journalism is required, with the media needing to play a better role.


To cite this article (7th APA style):

Ong’ong’a, D. O. (2022). The role of online news consumers in lessening the extent of misinformation on social media platforms? Journal Communication Spectrum: Capturing New Perspectives in Communication 12(2), 96-111.


Constructive journalism, Misinformation, Media literacy, Social Media, YouTube


Ackland, R., & Gwynn, K. (2020). Truth and the dynamics of news diffusion on Twitter. In R. Greifeneder, M. Jaffe, E. Newman, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation (pp. 27-46). Routledge.

Ashley, S., Maksl, A., & Craft, S. (2017). News media literacy and political engagement: What’s the connection? Journal of Media Literacy Education, 9(1), 79-98.

Belair-Gagnon, V., Nelson, J. L., & Lewis, S. C. (2018). Audience engagement, reciprocity, and the pursuit of community connectedness in public media journalism. Journalism Practice, 13(5), 558-575.

Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122-139.

Benson, R. (2017). Can foundations solve the journalism crisis? Journalism, 19(8), 1059-1077.

Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2017). See something, say something: Correction of global health misinformation on social media. Health Communication, 33(9), 1131-1140.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. SAGE Publications.

Bro, P. (2018). Constructive journalism: Proponents, precedents, and principles. Journalism, 20(4), 504-519.

Cherubini, F., & Nielsen, R. K. (2016). Editorial analytics: How news media are developing and using audience data and metrics. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Clayton, K., Davis, J., Hinckley, K., & Horiuchi, Y. (2019). Partisan motivated reasoning and misinformation in the media: Is news from ideologically uncongenial sources more suspicious? Japanese Journal of Political Science, 20(3), 129-142.

Domenico, G. D., Sit, J., Ishizaka, A., & Nunan, D. (2020). Fake news, social media and marketing: A systematic review. Journal of Business Research, 124, 329-341.

Domingo, D., Quandt, T., Heinonen, A., Paulussen, S., Singer, J. B., & Vujnovic, M. (2008). Participatory journalism practices in the media and beyond: An international comparative study of initiatives in online newspapers. Journalism Practice, 2(3), 326-342.

Egelhofer, J. L., & Lecheler, S. (2019). Fake news as a two-dimensional phenomenon: A framework and research agenda. Annals of the International Communication Association, 43(2), 97-116.

Greifeneder, R., Jaffe, M., Newman, E., & Schwarz, N. (2020). The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation. Routledge.

Guo, C., Cao, J., Zhang, X., Shu, K., & Yu, M. (2019). Exploiting emotions for fake news detection on social media (arXiv:1903.01728v1 [cs.CL]). arXiv.

Harcup, T., & O’Neill, D. (2016). What is news? News values revisited (again). Journalism Studies, 18(12), 1470-1488.

Harsin, J. (2018). Post-truth and critical communication studies. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication.

Hermans, L., & Drok, N. (2018). Placing constructive journalism in context. Journalism Practice, 12(6), 679-694.

Iphofen, R., & Tolich, M. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research ethics. SAGE Publications.

Joffe, H., & Yardley, L. (2004). Content and thematic analysis. In D. F. Marks & L. Yardley (Eds.), Research methods for clinical and health psychology (pp. 56-68). SAGE Publications.

Lasswell, H. D. (1927). The theory of political propaganda. American Political Science Review, 21(3), 627-631.

Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., Schudson, M., Sloman, S. A., Sunstein, C. R., Thorson, E. A., Watts, D. J., & Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news: Addressing fake news requires a multidisciplinary effort. Science, 359(6380), 1094-1096.

Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K., & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353-369.

Marchi, R. (2012). With Facebook, blogs, and fake news, teens reject journalistic “objectivity”. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 36(3), 246-262.

Margolin, D. B., Hannak, A., & Weber, I. (2017). Political fact-checking on Twitter: When do corrections have an effect? Political Communication, 35(2), 196-219.

Mast, J., Coesemans, R., & Temmerman, M. (2018). Constructive journalism: Concepts, practices, and discourses. Journalism, 20(4), 492-503.

Mihailidis, P., & Viotty, S. (2017). Spreadable spectacle in digital culture: Civic expression, fake news, and the role of media Literacies in “post-fact” society. American Behavioral Scientist, 61(4), 441-454.

Milmo, D. (2022, January 12). YouTube is major conduit of fake news, factcheckers say. The Guardian.

Mishra, A., & Samu, S. (2021). Impact of fake news on social image perceptions and consumers’ behavioral intentions. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 38(6), 601-613.

Nelson, J. L. (2019). The next media regime: The pursuit of ‘audience engagement’ in journalism. Journalism, 22(9), 2350-2367.

Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. SAGE Publications.

Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175-220.

Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2015). Displacing misinformation about events: An experimental test of causal corrections. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(1), 81-93.

Obadă, D., & Dabija, D. (2022). “In flow”! Why do users share fake news about environmentally friendly brands on social media? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(8), 4861.

Oloo, O. D. (2021). Exploring the social media culture of commenting: YouTube users sentiments of “Misinformation” on international news media sphere. Social Communication, 7(1), 90-100.

Ong’ong’a, D. O. (2022). Online citizen perception of China’s engagement in Kenya: Media reporting on standard gauge railway. In X. Zhang & C. K. Schultz (Eds.), China's international communication and relationship building. Routledge.

Ong’ong’a, O. (2021). Countering the new media podia: Youth and ‘Fake news’ in Kenya. Shanlax International Journal of Arts, Science and Humanities, 8(4), 8-12.

Ong’ong’a, O. D. (2020). Syndrome-analysis of new media and political economy in 21st century. Journal of New Media and Mass Communication, 6(1), 8-11.

Pate, U. A., Gambo, D., & Ibrahim, A. M. (2019). The impact of fake news and the emerging post-truth political era on Nigerian polity: A review of literature. Studies in Media and Communication, 7(1), 21-29.

Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking. Journal of Personality, 88(2), 185-200.

Posner, M. (2022, June 21). YouTube amplifies misinformation and hatred, but here’s what we can do about it. Forbes.

Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2020). Breaking harmony Square: A game that “inoculates” against political misinformation. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 1(8).

Roudik, P. (Ed.) (2019). Initiatives to counter fake news in selected countries (LL File No. 2019-017228). The Law Library of Congresss, Global Legal Research Directorate.

Tandoc, E. C. Jr. (2019). The facts of fake news: A research review. Sociology Compass, 13(2).

Thornton, B. (2000). The moon hoax: Debates about ethics in 1835 New York newspapers. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 15(2), 89-100.

Vargo, C. J., Guo, L., & Amazeen, M. A. (2017). The agenda-setting power of fake news: A big data analysis of the online media landscape from 2014 to 2016. New Media & Society, 20(5), 2028-2049.

Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151.

Vraga, E. K., Bode, L., & Tully, M. (2020). Creating news literacy messages to enhance expert corrections of misinformation on Twitter. Communication Research, 49(2), 245-267.

Waisbord, S. (2018). Truth is what happens to news: On journalism, fake news, and post-truth. Journalism Studies, 19(13), 1866-1878.

Wijaya, B. S. (2019). Dancing with the impropriety of media: How Indonesian consumers think and behave towards the unethical and illogical online news. Malaysian Journal of Communication, 35(1), 187-205.

Wijaya, B. S. (2022). On the corruption of communication: A theory of deception. Studies in Media and Communication, 10(2), 129-144.

Wijaya, B. S., Anitawati, M. T., Suharyanti, & Fortunisa, A. (2022). Media brand reputation in the digital milieu: The effects of online news ethics and logic on media brand image. Malaysian Journal of Communication, 38(3), 106-125.

Yanqiu, Z., & Matingwina, S. (2018). Exploring alternative journalistic approaches to report on China and Africa relations? Comparative study of two best reporting awards projects in China and South Africa. Journal of African Media Studies, 10(1), 21-37.

Young, D. G., Jamieson, K. H., Poulsen, S., & Goldring, A. (2017). Fact-checking effectiveness as a function of format and tone: Evaluating and Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(1), 49-75.

Zubiaga, A., Liakata, M., Procter, R., Wong Sak Hoi, G., & Tolmie, P. (2016). Analysing how people Orient to and spread rumours in social media by looking at conversational threads. PLOS ONE, 11(3), e0150989.

Full Text: PDF EN


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Indexed by:

Archived in:

Listed in: