Pemilihan Vendor Dalam Proyek Mud Removal Pada Tambang Batu Bara (Studi Kasus PT. Darma Henwa)

doi:10.36782/jemi.v6i1.2422

Pemilihan Vendor Dalam Proyek Mud Removal Pada Tambang Batu Bara (Studi Kasus PT. Darma Henwa)

Rikko Denia, Aurino R.A. Djamaris

Abstract

This study aims to identify the criteria used in determining vendors for the mud removal project in a coal mine using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Another objective is to determine the best vendor for the project based on the AHP method. PT. Darma Henwa, Tbk, as one of the leading mining contractor services in Indonesia, needs to improve efficiency and effectiveness in carrying out coal mining operations in order to remain competitive and increase business revenue.The results of the study show that the criteria used for selecting mud removal project service providers in the coal mine are Service/Experience, Contract and Commercial, and Machine/Manufacturing. Based on the overall calculations, Alternative 3 obtained the highest score of 23.273% and ranked first. Alternative 2 obtained a score of 23.089% and ranked second, followed by Alternative 4 with a score of 17.190% and ranked third. Alternative 1 obtained a score of 16.686% and ranked fourth, while Alternatives 5 and 6 scored 11.147% and 8.616% respectively, ranking fifth and sixth. This indicates that PT. Darma Henwa, Tbk prefers Alternative 3 as the best vendor based on all the criteria used.In this study, the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method was successfully applied to determine the best vendor for the mud removal project in the coal mine. The AHP method was used to calculate the weights of criteria and vendor alternatives based on expert assessments. The criteria used were Service/Experience, Contract and Commercial, and Machine/Manufacturing. The evaluated vendor alternatives were Alternative 1 to Alternative 6. This study used the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) method to determine the best vendor for the mud removal project in the coal mine. The criteria used were Service/Experience, Contract and Commercial, and Machine/Manufacturing. Based on the AHP analysis results, Alternative 3 was selected as the best vendor with an AHP value of 23.273%. Alternative 2 ranked second with a value of 23.089%. The Service/Experience criterion had the highest weight with a value of 0.568, followed by the Contract and Commercial criterion with a weight of 0.334, and the Machine/Manufacturing criterion with a weight of 0.098. The recommendation provided is to choose Alternative 3 as the best vendor while considering other relevant aspects for the company.Keywords: Vendor Selection; Mud Removal Projects; Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)

Keywords

Vendor Selection; Mud Removal Projects; Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)

References

Amid, A., Ghodsypour, S. H., & O’Brien, C. (2009). A weighted additive fuzzy multiobjective model for the supplier selection problem under price breaks in a supply Chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 121(2), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.02.040

Cahyadi, T. A., Magdalena, S., Haryanto, D., Ratminah, W. D., Rosadi, P. E., & Asmara, P. E. (2020). Planning of mining water management costs. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2245. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0007076

Chai, Y., & Schoon, M. (2016). Institutions and government efficiency: Decentralized irrigation management in China. International Journal of the Commons, 10(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.555

Durdyev, S., Omarov, M., & Ismail, S. (2017). Causes of delay in residential construction projects in Cambodia. Cogent Engineering, 4(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2017.1291117

Fugger, N., Katok, E., & Wambach, A. (2019). Trust in procurement interactions. Management Science, 65(11), 5110–5127. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2018.3196

Gergin, R. E., Peker, I., & Kısa, A. C. G. (2022). SUPPLIER SELECTION BY INTEGRATED IFDEMATEL-IFTOPSIS METHOD: A CASE STUDY OF AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY INDUSTRY. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame211221075g

Hosseini, S., & Khaled, A. Al. (2019). A hybrid ensemble and AHP approach for resilient supplier selection. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 30(1), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1241-y

Khoshfetrat, S., Rahiminezhad Galankashi, M., & Almasi, M. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation: a fuzzy approach. Engineering Optimization, 52(9). https://doi.org/10.1080/0305215X.2019.1663185

KWATSIMA, S. (2015). an Investigation Into the Causes of Delay in Large Civil Engineering Projects in Kenya. 72. Retrieved from http://ir.jkuat.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/123456789/1604/Kwatsima%2C Symon Antony- MSc. Construction Engineering and mangement -2015 construct1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Mirsa Diah Novianti,, Anitawati, Aurino Djamaris, A. A. (2016). Analisis Kriteria Pemilihan Supplier Menggunakan Metode Analytic Network Process (Studi Kasus pada PTXYZ). In Universitas Bakrie. Retrieved from https://repository.bakrie.ac.id/335/1/Laporan penelitian genap 1516_MDN-ARD-ANT.pdf

Pujawan, I. N. (2011). The Effect of Different Payment Terms on Order Variability in a Supply Chain. In Successful Strategies in Supply Chain Management. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-303-6.ch005

Saaty, T. L. (2013). The modern science of multicriteria decision making and its practical applications: The AHP/ANP approach. Operations Research, 61(5). https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2013.1197

Safa, M., Shahi, A., Haas, C. T., & Hipel, K. W. (2014). Supplier selection process in an integrated construction materials management model. Automation in Construction, 48, 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2014.08.008

San Cristóbal, J. R. (2012). Contractor Selection Using Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(6), 751–758. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000488

Streule, T., Miserini, N., Bartlomé, O., Klippel, M., & De Soto, B. G. (2016). Implementation of Scrum in the Construction Industry. Procedia Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.619

Yadav, V., & Sharma, M. K. (2015). Multi-criteria decision making for supplier selection using fuzzy AHP approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 22(6), 1158–1174. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2014-0036

Full Text: PDF