Ayi Tejaningrum, Indri Rustyani Indri Rustyani


Determining the cause of the dominant suitability in a process is the final goal of this study, so the company is able to take action for improvement. The study was conducted at PT. Berdikari Metal Engineering with object research products of Dies Holder Comp Element. The main problem at this time regarding the number of defects is still high, reaching 7.9%. In January to June 2018, the total production reached 735,395 pcs with the number of incompatible products of 52,382 pcs. Case study research methods with quantitative descriptive analysis as the basis for analysis, and Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA) are used as tools in problem solving. Based on field analysis, the highest RPN value is found in the casting process with a value of 400, so companies must improve accuracy in the stages of material refinement, material classification and rolling process so that it reaches a thickness of 0.4 mm and a length of 39.5 mm. Some actions that should be taken by the company include improving HR skills, especially in the process of working accuracy, making changes in factory air temperature, doing engine maintenance. With this proposal, it is expected to reduce product incompatibility by 31%.


Quality Product, FMEA, RPN (Risk Priority Number)


D.H. Stamatis. 1995. Failure Mode and Effect Analisys : FMEA from Theory to Axecution, Milwauke. ASQC Quality.

Firdaus, R., Sukmono, T., dan Akbar, A. (2010), Perbaikan proses produksi muffler dengan metode FMEA pada industri kecil di Sidoarjo, Teknolojia, Vol.5, hlm. 83-88.

Iswanto, A., Rambe, A., Jabbar M., dan Ginting, E. (2013), Aplikasi Metode Taguchi Analysis dan Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) untuk Perbaikan Kualitas Produk di PT. XYZ, e-Jurnal Teknik Industri USU, Vol. No. 2, hlm. 13-18.

Muzakkir S.M., Harish Hirani., Lijesk K.P. 2015. Failure Mode and Effect Analisys of Journal Bearing. International Journal of Applied Engineerin Research. Vol 10. No 6.

McDermott, Raymond J Mikulak and Michael R Beauregard, The Basics of FMEA (2009), Second Edition, Productivity Press, Taylor and Francis Group, New York.

Nanda, L., Hartanti, L., & Runtuk, K. (2014), Analisis Risiko Kualitas Produk dalam Proses Produksi Miniatur Bis dengan Metode Failure Mode and Effect Analysis pada Usaha Kecil Menengah Niki Kayoe, Jurnal Gema Aktualita, Vol. 3 No. 2, hlm. 71-82.

Nia Budhi P. Ganesstri., Purnawan., 2017. Analaisis Identifikasi Masalah Dengan Menggunakan Metode Failure Mode and Effect Analisys (FMEA) dan Risk Priority Number (RPN) pada Sub Assebly Line. Jurnal Teknik Industri. Vol 12, No. 2.

Ookalkar,A., Joshi, A.G., & Ookalkar, S.D. 2009. Quality Improvement in Haemodialysis Process Using FMEA. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 817-830.

Prihartono, S.2012,. Konsep pengendalian Kualitas., Bandung. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Rakesh, R., Jos B. C., & Mathew, G. 2013. FMEA Analisys for Reductin Breakdowaan of a Sub System in the Life Cara Product Manufacturing Industry. International Journal of Engineering Science and Innovation Technology.

Richama Yulinda., Hendang., Susy., 2015. Perbaikan Kualitas Produk Keraton Luxury dengan menggunakan Metode FMEA dan Fault Tree Analisys (FTA). Jurnal Teknik Industri Itenas., Vol 03., No.,03.

Sutrisno, A., & Lee, T-R.2011. Service Reliability Assesment Using FMEA: Survey and Opportunity Roadmap. International Journal of Engineerin, Science and Technology, 25 – 38.

Tejaningrum A. 2017. Quality Culture and Capability Process Supply Chain in SME. International Journal Organization and Innovation. Vol 5.,No 4.

Full Text: PDF


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Indexed by :


Editorial Office :

Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Industry (JEMI)

Jl. HR Rasuna Said Kav. C-22, Rasuna Epicentrum, Kuningan. Jakarta Selatan 12920. email :

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.